Let me say up-front, I don’t think Dan Mullen is responsible for the actions of any of his players, good or bad.
Also, I want to point out that the vast majority of Gators players make good decisions. We don’t put nearly the amount of focus on how the coaches influence those players in a good way, but surely they have an impact on their lives and decisions. You can’t spend that much time together without doing so.
But you also can’t tell the story of the Dan Mullen era thus far at Florida without mentioning the five members of the program who have been dismissed for allegations of violence against women.
Partly this is because one of those people was a staff member (Otis Yelverton). Partly this is because three of the players were evaluated and signed by Mullen’s regime (Justin Watkins, Jalon Jones and John Huggins).
And partly this is because Mullen will always be tied to Urban Meyer’s tenure at UF.
Meyer presided over perhaps the most successful period of Gators football. But he also presided over teams that were perceived as being out of control, as evidenced by more than 30 player arrests and allegedly allowing an assistant coach’s wife to be pressured into rescinding a domestic violence accusation during his tenure.
It doesn’t help that two key players from that era (Aaron Hernandez and Tony Joiner) have been charged – and in Hernandez’ case, convicted – of murder.
So that’s the backdrop that those outside the Florida program have when looking at the recent spate of dismissals; a program out of control.
Again, I don’t believe you can blame Mullen for his players’ and staff members’ actions. These are people who made individual decisions and get to pay the consequences for those decisions.
But like it or not – and whether it is fair to Mullen or not – perceptions matter.
These aren’t minor accusations either.
Yelverton is perhaps the most benign of the accusations, as he is alleged to have stalked and threatened a former girlfriend. Huggins is accused of choking a woman who was tutoring him. The police report for the Watkins incident includes allegations of “wrapping his hands around her neck three times, once for 15 seconds and twice for about eight seconds.” Jones is alleged to have committed sexual battery against two women on the same night.
At some point, it is incumbent upon a leader to drive change when people under his watch aren’t meeting expectations or the expectations of the program. That’s exactly what Mullen would do if one of his players wasn’t playing well enough or one of his coaches wasn’t performing.
He didn’t hesitate to replace Peter Sirmon with Todd Grantham after only one year when things weren’t working out on the defensive side of the ball at Mississippi State. That same approach should be taken when examining player behavior off the field.
It isn’t fair to blame Tampa Bay Times columnist Matt Baker for unearthing police reports regarding Huggins. He has a job to do and with a program as high profile as Florida, a story like that is newsworthy.
And Brenda Tracy is an advocate for women who have been hurt by football players and programs. If any of these allegations are true, women have been hurt by people whom Mullen has brought to campus. I believe any criticism of those two is misguided.
Instead, I hope that those within the program see the media attention given to Huggins’ dismissal as an opportunity.
It’s an opportunity for Florida to prove that it is different than other programs out there. It is an opportunity to show real leadership and discuss the nuance of issues tied to domestic and sexual violence.
To his credit, Mullen tried to outline all that the program is doing about this issue when asked by Baker, saying, “the great thing is educating on how to make good decisions. Everything gets back to decision making, how can I make good decisions in life? If they are learning how to make good decisions and how to put yourself in good situations, that’s how we spend all our time educating our guys on those things — and trying to educate the team as whole.”
But I think this situation requires some actual specifics.
Mullen could talk about who UF invites to speak to players about domestic and sexual violence. George Wynn was the Assistant AD for Football Operations under Will Muschamp and Jim McElwain from 2011-2017. He was an advocate for an organization called Peaceful Paths and invited them to come speak to the players about relationships within the framework of prevention recommended by the CDC. Is that still in place and if not, what took its place?
Mullen could also certainly talk about how UF gathers background information about players the program is recruiting, and perhaps how they are evaluating that process to ensure high-risk recruits don’t come to campus or have support when they arrive.
If nothing else, Mullen could get up to the podium and say the following:
We’ve dismissed players and staff from the program because of decisions they made to participate in behavior that is unacceptable for those representing the University of Florida. We are re-examining all aspects of our program to prevent it from happening again. One time is unacceptable and our players need to know that, and we need to make sure we have clearly communicated that to them. The fact that these incidents have occurred indicates that we need to do a better job, and we will do so.
I disagree with the opinion put forward – as some have – that Mullen has done his job simply by dismissing these individuals.
First, there is evidence that suggests that draconian penalties like dismissal, particularly for situations involving domestic violence, actually harm the victims and make them less likely to report assaults. But second, to believe that dismissing the personnel absolves the program and the university from taking a deeper look at its policies (and clearly communicating them to the public) just raises the risk of another incident occurring.
Bill Parcells famously said, “you are what your record says you are.” Parcells was talking about wins and losses, but the same applies here.
Because of Florida’s history with Meyer – and Mullen’s connection to him – those outside the program are going to always be hyper-sensitive to these sorts of issues at Florida. In all honesty, if Mullen really has learned from Meyer, he should be hyper-sensitive to these issues as well.
Whenever people are getting hurt, good people take a look at whether they have any culpability and make changes. I believe Mullen to be a good person. This is an opportunity for him, his athletic director and his staff to lead a difficult conversation about these issues, but it requires more than just generalities for five minutes before moving on to talk about the upcoming game against Miami.
“You are what your record says you are.” The great part about that line is you can do something about it.
Here’s hoping that Florida does something about the outside perception that it is a program with cultural issues and moves the conversation forward.
That would be a much more powerful legacy than another national championship.
Brian Vargecko
Couldn’t more agree with your assessment, Will. I would love for Mullen to see this article and follow your advice. First and foremost my heart breaks for the victims of these incidents, but also, it’s an absolutely terrible look for the program we love, and as you say, perception matters. And leadership does make a difference in these areas as we saw under the Muschamp era. I welcome any debate, trash talk, etc. from rivals but what I can’t stomach is when folks go right for that aspect of the program, which occurred for me just last week. Thanks for the great article. Let’s hope we eliminate these incidents forever and Go Gators 2019!
George Moraitis
Guys do a good job and I look forward to receiving the emails
tom
This to me this is really an off-season topic and pretty much a “Debbie Downer” article at this point. You’d been better off covering the dismissal in one paragraph and then moved on to what it means for the season for Florida with regards to DB depth with the season opener just a little over a couple weeks away.
Will Miles
I’m sure I’ll cover that at some point. DB depth takes a back seat for me. That’s fine if you feel otherwise.
Carey H Freeman
I agree with your assessment, but don’t think any of it would help with respect to the media and their perception. The mainstream media are lazy and they don’t care about nuance. The “gotcha” is the moment that matters for them and they already caught that fish. Likewise, the perception of Florida schools in general (correct or not) is pretty much set in stone in the mainstream media. I agree that we should make attempts to correct that, but I wouldn’t keep my fingers crossed. I can tell you from first-hand experience that The Times isn’t interested in a “nuanced” version of this tale.
Fred
Will;
Appreciate your approach to this topic with regard to how CDM might have responded to the questions put forward at the press conference last week. Also, your specific questions regarding exactly what the education of the staff and players consists of is a fair question.
As you stated “perception” matters. In this regard I believe CDM has dismissed everyone connected with this type of unacceptable behavior whether they were convicted or not. After all of the investigations were conducted and all facts known. I’m a retired HR executive and can tell you these cases (as far as we can tell) were managed by protocol usually found in large, high profile organizations.
Your suggestion that CDM fire, ready, aim when such a case surfaces is fine in theory, although in the real world the legal protocols require “tapping the brakes” to ensure a thorough investigation. Tapping the brakes includes “administrative leave” for staff and the “bench” for players; which I believe you said happened in each of the cases.
Your statement is very effective at characterizing the position one would hope a leader defines regarding these unacceptable behaviors (violence against women, but anyone). Unfortunately, CDM didn’t have a week to prepare a clean statement, he is required to address ad hoc questions on the fly. Could he have been more polished? Yes, there’s no question.
I can tell you that CDM believes in treating others with respect, how do I know that? Actions speak louder than words; the proof is in the pudding – 5 guys got outside the lines and they’re gone. That’s the question I would put to him in an interview for a leadership position; how have you handled cases where (after the facts are all in) players or staff have committed unacceptable behavior?
He told the media in the interview, each case is considered on its own merits. He doesn’t get in the middle of the investigation, but waits for the dust to clear. In the meantime the player or staff is in effect “placed on leave.” Then he evaluates and makes a call.
You (and other members of the media) suggested he needs to do a better job screening recruits. I agree with that to a point. On the other hand in today’s litigious world how is one supposed to “vet” everyone? Especially 16 and 17 year olds, many of whom have made some “bonehead” decisions in their life. Also, when such behavior is discovered, should the coach give the player a chance to “turn things around?” Having hired many employees in my career, it is impossible to totally ‘vet’ them, and it’s not until they’re on board are you able to see underneath the surface what you’ve brought on board. If ‘vetting’ were easy the NFL would bat 100% with their 1st round picks.
Lastly, neither CDM nor the university can discuss the nuances of these cases; there are laws and regs that prevent such discussion. Also, of what value would that do other than to create ‘click bait’ ala the Epstein case? I submit that helps neither the victims nor the staff or player move forward in life through recovery and rehabilitation.
While you have made some great points, that are worthy of consideration regarding what you would like to see from CDM and the university; I believe CDM and the university have acted in a responsible manner to all concerned. Can it improve? Every institution and leader can always be +1 (%) better in every area, especially this area of the workplace and world. Your question regarding what are they doing to improve is a great question.
Respectfully,
Fred
Will Miles
Thanks for your thoughts Fred. Hopefully this didn’t come off as a criticism of Mullen. It wasn’t intended that way. It was meant to frame the outside perception (I live in the northeast and have fielded questions) and potential avenues to not only improve that perception, but obtain that 1% improvement that you speak of.
In no way do I want anyone’s due process rights infringed upon. I have no line of sight to the internal processes used and they may have been top tier. I also don’t know what screening is done of recruits or what education is given to players. And I also know that no matter the answer to each of these things, sometimes things go wrong.
All I’m suggesting is clarity — not for any specific case — but for the program overall, is a good place to start.
Mike
I think you are too hard on Mullen. One accusation against a person is not a record or reason for dismissal. Mullen waited for the facts to come out. Then once there was clear evidence there was a problem in each case he dismissed them. Something Mayer never did.
Will Miles
I agree with you. What I’d like to see is clear communication of what the education that he talks about consists of, and whether the program is making any changes in that area or the area of screening recruits. That’s all. It isn’t a criticism of Mullen so much as a realization that specifics matter in this case.
Carey Freeman
So, what if said “screening” leads to less stars? Certainly going to be backlash there (Hell, there was backlash from “recruiting guy” for an 8th-ranked class) I get the feeling this is something that will have to work itself out over time. Winning cures everything, right? So, more wins, more championships and perhaps you can be more selective. But, right now, he’s between a rock and a hard place, IMO.
Will Miles
Every program has to deal with a risk/reward when looking at what recruits can do on the field versus what issues there might be off the field. There are plenty of programs with high-level recruits that have not had this many incidents.
I’m not saying it is Mullen’s fault or that the screening process isn’t robust. I am saying that I think it is legitimate to ask for clarity as to what processes are in place and how they may or may not improve.
Bryan
Another great article Will. keep up the good work.
Mack Steger
It is interesting that a school faced with a discipline situation is criticized and labeled for the “culture” of its program. But the next school which takes him is viewed as giving a chance for a player.
John N Robinson
Why is this a story every day Mullen did his part by trying to give these kids the opportunity to better themselves. He didn’t raise them for a young age where they have probably seen abuse of women and now that they are young men the only way they to deal with women when they are mad is to hit the. So instead picking low hanging fruit like story about 5 kids being dismissed in 2 years. Let’s dig deeper and to these kids so they don’t raise the next generation of men that thank it ok to hit women. Let not keep dragging Mullen in the mud for trying to show these young men a better way of life.
Ian MacLaren
I am always frustrated when people point to the 30 arrests in the Meyer era as proof Florida Football was some kind of rouge program. All arrests are not equal. My question is what discipline situation was not handled appropriately by Coach Meyer?
Those arrests include barking at a police dog, getting a car out of the impound after paying to get it out of the impound, etc. Many in the media point to Hernandez’s violent, sociopathic murders after he left the program as proof that Florida was bad. No one accuses the Patriots of anything, and that is where he played when those murders occurred. Coach Meyer looks bad now based on the continued violence of a guy he fired (but not fast enough for some). At Florida, he was confronted with a horrible situation, but one BOTH parties stated they wanted to work through it.
Domestic and partner violence takes place outside of the public view and almost always involves conflicting stories and equivocal evidence (which his why the conviction rate for these crimes is so low; most DV is handled on a separate docket in Florida. Check out DV trial call if you have the opportunity). The idea that you will be able to tell what HS kids will develop into abusers, which can helped, and which are not a problem through greater research is naive at best. Mullen seems to have taken appropriate action in the situations that have come up in his tenure at Florida; though it appears he made the right decision in Sirrmons at Miss State ( and there was no doubt about his guilt there).
In contrast, Dalvin Cook did not face consequences when a jury determined the evidence did not support a conviction “beyond a reasonable doubt” (the highest burden in our legal system). Crab legs was involved in a BB gun fight of such alarming intensity that there was a helicopter called in until it was determined that the football team was involved and no arrests were made. We all know the other allegations against him. Ben Rothelsburger is a serial rapist ( I have read the statements of the women involved and believe them; others may not) and no one even talks about that anymore.
Chris Varney
Here here Will! Well said and, as usual, a well-written, relevant, and sensitive piece dealing with a tough subject. Keep up the great work.
Will Miles
Thanks Chris! Appreciate the feedback and appreciate you reading.