Site icon Read & Reaction

The 12-Team College Football Playoff Preview
Part 1: Which schools make the field?

An expanded 12-team playoff field seems like it is just around the corner for college football. This series will focus on how a 12-team playoff could play out. 

On November 14, 2011, the Presidential Oversight Committee members met in Denver to discuss the formation of a playoff in college football.

The meeting took place just two Saturdays after #1 LSU went on the road and held off #2 Alabama in a defensive slugfest for a 9-6 victory in the “Game of the Century.” Les Miles improved his record to 3-2 over Nick Saban’s Crimson Tide and LSU dealt what seemed like the death blow to any hopes of the Tide capturing its second title under Saban.

It was not unheard of for a team who did not win their conference to make the BCS title game, (Nebraska (2001 Rose Bowl) and Oklahoma (2004 Sugar) each failed to win their conference), but until LSU-Bama battled down to the wire on an early November 2011 night in Tuscaloosa, the odds were stacked against two teams from the same conference landing in both of the top spots in the final BCS rankings.

There had been one notable previous attempt to argue the two best teams played in the same conference heading into the BCS Championship Game. In 2006, Chad Henne’s #2 Wolverines fell to eventual Heisman Trophy winner Troy Smith and the #1 Buckeyes in The Game’s version of the “Game of the Century.”  However, voters vaulted the SEC Champion Gators into the final #2 BCS ranking over Michigan and after Urban Meyer’s  second Florida roster scorched Ohio State in the desert and Michigan fell to USC in the Rose Bowl, there was no question that the voters had made the right call in giving the Gators a shot.

Back to 2011 – Alabama was punished for the loss to LSU and dropped to the #4 spot in the polls behind unbeatens LSU, Oklahoma State, and Stanford. Another unbeaten loomed, but it was #5 Boise State. Group of Five teams have a tough enough time making their case for a four-team playoff, so a top-two ranking in the BCS era was out of the question. Every other major Power Five threat had been saddled with at least one-loss, but none of those losses had impressed voters as much as Alabama’s valiant effort against the top-ranked Tigers.

Over the next two weeks, Stanford took a 53-30 beating at the hands of Oregon and Oklahoma State fell in double overtime to Iowa State, not Matt Campbell Iowa State…Paul Rhodes Iowa State. In case the universe needed to deliver more help to Crimson Tide, Boise State managed to drop a game to TCU as well leaving the Houston Cougars, a non-threat in the polls, as the lone unbeaten Group of Five team. When the final standings took shape on December 5, 2011, the pollsters decided Oklahoma State and Stanford’s losses did not impress as much as Bama’s lone defeat and rewarded the Tide with the final #2 BCS ranking to set up an unprecedented All-SEC BCS Championship showdown in the Sugar Bowl against both conference and division rival, LSU.

Embed from Getty Images

The perfect storm created a mess at the top giving voters the ability to justify their decision to rank Alabama as the second-best team in the nation:

2011 Final BCS Rankings

  1. LSU (13-0), SEC Champion
  2. Alabama (11-1), 2nd place SEC West
  3. Oklahoma State (11-1), Big XII Champion
  4. Stanford (11-1), 2nd place Pac-12 North
  5. Oregon (10-2), Pac-12 Champion

Nobody outside of Tuscaloosa was happy with this arrangement especially since the SEC had won five straight national championships dating back to 2006 Florida and by the summer of 2012, the BCS Presidential Oversight Committee voted to allow the concept which would lead to the College Football Playoff.

Adam Himmelsbach of The New York Times wrote, “After all the controversy surrounding the much-derided Bowl Championship Series, after the annual debates about which teams deserved to play in the national title game, a four-team playoff will be implemented in the 2014 season.

“Now there will be controversy over which teams are Nos. 4 and 5 as opposed to 1 and 2,” SEC Commissioner Roy Kramer told Himmelsbach. “But this does broaden participation, and I think that’s what they were looking for.”

In an era that had come to be dominated by the SEC, a four-team playoff was seen as a way to help schools from other conferences get their foot in the door on a more regular basis.

Through eight seasons, the playoff has incorporated teams from every part of the FBS footprint: each of the Power Five Conferences, an Independent, and, finally, a Group of Five school.

The SEC has still been featured in seven of the eight national title games including  two All-SEC matchups (Bama-Georgia) in 2017 and 2021. In five of those seven tries, the SEC has walked away with another national title (Bamax3, LSU, and Georgia).

Last week, well-known anti-playoff expansionist, Josh Pate of The Late Kick (24/7 Sports), issued a warning to the rest of college football.

You really want to see yourself in a situation, a tournament, in college football where you get in with no cap on the SEC and, all of a sudden,  now you’re watching meaningful playoff games…MEANINGFUL PLAYOFF GAMES…as opposed to those meaningless bowl games, you’re setting yourself up for disaster. You’re setting yourself up, down the road, for a three-out-of-four or a four-out-of-four clean sweep semifinal featuring all SEC teams.

-Josh Pate, The Late Kick (24/7 Sports)

The SEC haters of the world will not appreciate Pate’s words of warning, writing it off as nothing more than SEC posturing.

One common misconception about the SEC: It’s a top-heavy league.

For those who decry the SEC as a top-heavy league full of teams assigning themselves credit for whatever combination of Alabama plus two is dominating the sport throughout a given season, I would ask you to hold that measure to any other league in America.

Five different SEC schools (Alabama, LSU, Florida, Auburn, and Georgia) have won national titles since 2008. Take it back a few more years to 1998 and that number bumps up to six with the inclusion of the Tennessee Volunteers.

Let’s use the “top-heavy” standard on any other conference – we’ll use the current conference affiliations even though Nebraska did not win national titles under the Big Ten flag, we’ll assign those values to the Big Ten for the sake of time.

Big Ten: To find six different national championships among the current members of the Big Ten, you’d have to go back to Minnesota in 1960. Ohio State, Michigan’s half-title in 1997, Nebraska as a Big XII member, Penn State as an independent twice in the 1980s, and 1965-1966 Michigan State fill out the other five.

ACC:  Similar to the Big Ten, 1959 Syracuse would be the sixth different school to claim a national title for the ACC (though the title was not won as a member of the league). Clemson, FSU, Miami (not ACC Miami), 1990 Georgia Tech, and 1976 Pitt (not ACC Pitt) were the first five schools on the list.

Big XII: 2005 Texas was the last Big XII school to raise a banner. Despite their seemingly annual contention, Oklahoma has failed to win a title since 2000. Since Nebraska and Colorado are being counted for other conferences, the run to find a third school that has won a national title stretches all the way back to the mighty 1938 TCU Horned Frogs (not a as Big XII member) led by Heisman Trophy winner Davey O’Brien and head coach Dutch Meyer. Since I’ve punished the Big XII by discounting Nebraska and Colorado, I’ll extend a helping hand and give them credit for future members UCF (2017 lol) and BYU (1984 robbed from UF) to extend their title count to five programs. Sticking with the theme of creating titles out of thin-air, Oklahoma State, previously known as Oklahoma A&M, was retroactively gifted a national title for their unbeaten 1945 season by the AFCA in the year of our Lord 2016. I wonder how the actual 1945 national champs in West Point feel about that claim? Let that be a lesson to the kids out there: If you use your imagination, you too can conjure up all kinds of magical national title claims!

Pac-12: Outside of USC, which last won in 2004, the Pac-12 is a wasteland when it comes to winning national titles. 1991 Washington and 1990 Colorado (Big XII member at the time) are the only league members to win it all since 1954 UCLA, 1926 Stanford, and , the sixth and final school, 1922 Cal. Oregon seems destined to win one at some point, but as of today, the old joke says that their logo matches the number of national titles: O.

If you give the SEC the entire timeline of college football, like we’ve done with the other conferences, Arkansas (not as a SEC member in 1964), Ole Miss (1960), Texas A&M (not as a SEC member in 1939, 1919) run the SEC total to nine different schools who have captured a national title at one point.

Though the SEC may appear to be top-heavy at times, nearly two-thirds of the league is capable of fielding a team worthy competing at a national championship level. That kind of depth does not exist in any other conference and to Josh Pate’s point, expanding the playoff will likely lead to more SEC dominance, at least in the near future.

Count ’em up

I still wanted to test Pate’s theory to further illustrate the point with specifics against a playoff field of 12-teams since it appears that will be the next step in expansion.

Using the A.P. Poll (it’s a consistent poll; BCS rankings didn’t start until 1998 and CFP rankings started in 2014, but the A.P. Poll has been a constant) dating back to 1992 (1. provides an even 30 years of data and 2. first season in which a conference championship game took place), I’ve calculated the number of playoff appearances each school and conference would have earned by way of a Top-12 ranking in the final regular season A.P. Poll (typically first Monday of December after conference championship weekend).

POWER FIVE

Embed from Getty Images

Total SEC Playoff Bids

92 (25.55%)

By Division

Alabama 16 SEC WEST 49
LSU 11
Auburn 9
Arkansas  4
Ole Miss 2
Mississippi State 1
Texas A&M 6
Georgia  14 SEC EAST 43
Florida  17
Tennessee 8
Kentucky 0
South Carolina 2
Vanderbilt 0
Missouri 2

*Assuming the Top -12 of A.P. Poll since 1992 created our playoff field: 

Total Big Ten Playoff Bids

76 (21.11%)

By Division

Ohio State 23
BIG TEN EAST
49
Michigan  8
Michigan State 7
Penn State 9
Indiana 1
Rutgers 0
Maryland 1
Wisconsin 8
BIG TEN WEST
27
Nebraska 9
Purdue 1
Minnesota 1
Northwestern 3
Illinois 1
Iowa  4

*Assuming the Top -12 of A.P. Poll since 1992 created our playoff field: 

Total Pac-12 Playoff Bids

54 (15%)

Oregon  12
Washington  5
Washington State 3
Oregon State 1
California 1
Stanford 6
Utah  4
Arizona State 2
UCLA 2
USC 10
Colorado  6
Arizona  2

 

 

*Assuming the Top -12 of A.P. Poll since 1992 created our playoff field: 

Embed from Getty Images

Total Big XII Playoff Bids

53 (14.72%)

Oklahoma  17
Texas  9
Oklahoma State 2
Texas Tech 1
TCU 5
Iowa State 1
Baylor 4
Kansas  2
Kansas State 9
West Virginia 3

*Assuming the Top -12 of A.P. Poll since 1992 created our playoff field: 

Total ACC Playoff Bids

50 (13.88%)

By Division

Clemson 7 ATLANTIC 25
Florida State 14
Louisville 2
Wake Forest 0
NC State 1
Syracuse 1
Boston College 0
Miami 9 COASTAL 25
Pittsburgh 0
Virginia Tech 9
Virginia  0
North Carolina  4
Georgia Tech 3
Duke 0

*Assuming the Top -12 of A.P. Poll since 1992 created our playoff field: 

FBS Independent

14 (3.88%)

Notre Dame 12
BYU 2

*Assuming the Top -12 of A.P. Poll since 1992 created our playoff field: 

GROUP OF FIVE

On the surface, it seems the Group of Five would have a ton to gain from a switch to a 12-team playoff. However, a 12-team field won’t be much friendlier to the Group of Five than either the BCS or four-team College Football Playoff.

*Assuming the Top -12 of A.P. Poll since 1992 created our playoff field: 

Group of Five schools have only earned a little over 5% of the playoff spots in a 12-team field since 1992 (19/360).

AMERICAN

8

Cincinnati 4
Houston 1
UCF 2
Tulane 1

MAC

1

Western Michigan 1
Embed from Getty Images

MOUNTAIN WEST

8

Colorado State 1
Hawaii 1
Boise State 6

SUN BELT

1

Coastal Carolina 1

CUSA

1

Marshall 1

Wrapping up

With the SEC and Big Ten combining for 46.66% of playoff spots in the 12-playoff field since 1992, it’s easy to see that simple expansion won’t necessarily cut back on the repetitious nature of our current four team playoff model.

Those percentages also lead me to believe that Josh Pate is correct in his assessment of a potential All-SEC semifinals, but is it in the sport’s best interest to avoid such a scenario?

The dominant teams will continue to dominate regardless of the model and while the final few teams may be repetitive, would a 12-team playoff field create more interest across the sport especially at programs which  rarely get a sniff at contending for a title?

Now that we know what a 12-team playoff field would look like (who would appear and how many times since 1992), what can we expect from the 12-team playoff based on the current proposals and talking points that have yet to be determined? What would matchups look like – hosted on home fields or bowl sites? What would a successful campaign for the 12th spot look like?

We’ll answer all of these questions in the next segment of The 12-Team College Football Playoff Preview.

Exit mobile version